Inilah Manfaat Menggunakan Brave Browser Untuk Penjelajahan Web

 Peramban web apa yang Anda gunakan? Sudahkah Anda melihat ke dalam menggunakan Brave Browser? Apakah Anda tidak bosan menggunakan Google Chrome, Safari, atau Mozilla Firefox? Saya yakin Anda harus mencoba browser ini.

Apa sebenarnya keberanian itu? Brave adalah browser yang berjalan di blockchain. Kemampuannya untuk memblokir iklan bisa sangat menjengkelkan. Ini juga menghemat uang untuk paket internet karena kami melihat iklan setiap kali kami melihat. Apa perbedaan antara ini dan browser atau pemblokir iklan lainnya? Ini, setidaknya, menarik.

Apakah efisien jika browser lain harus menggunakan Add-Ons atau Extensions lagi? Saya tidak percaya begitu, karena Extension pada akhirnya akan menyebabkan komplikasi. Konten terkadang dilarang, yang cukup menjengkelkan.

Jika Anda menggunakan Brave ini, saya jamin akan bersih dan rapi, membuat browsing lebih menyenangkan. Jadi, berikut adalah beberapa manfaat menggunakan browser Brave:

Kecepatan memuat halaman

Brave memuat halaman dengan cepat, bahkan lebih cepat dari Google Chrome. Coba buktikan sendiri sobat, jika ingin menghemat baterai. Namun, jika Anda kekurangan waktu, menonton film atau membaca komik online adalah cara yang bagus untuk menghabiskan waktu.

Blokir iklan dan lindungi privasi Anda.

Brave memberikan privasi yang baik, oleh karena itu Anda tidak perlu menggunakan mode penyamaran. Brave telah melakukan segala kemungkinan untuk melindungi privasi Anda, termasuk memblokir pelacak situs web. Fitur utama Brave sebenarnya melarang iklan, dan Anda akan melihat perbedaannya.

HTTPS Upgrade

Kapasitas ini untuk melindungi informasi pribadi Anda, informasi pembayaran, dan informasi lainnya.

Penghematan biaya dan data

Dengan menggunakan browser Brave, Anda akan mengkonsumsi lebih sedikit data dan menghemat uang karena semua iklan dan pelacakan dilarang, dan hanya halaman penting yang diprioritaskan.

Virus harus dihindari.

Brave tidak hanya memblokir iklan dan pelacak, tetapi juga menambahkan keamanan ekstra untuk mengurangi bahaya terinfeksi malware, ransomware, atau spyware.

Read More

Ugandan courtrooms A Congolese parrot trafficker was sentenced to seven years in prison.

 For trafficking African grey parrots, a Congolese national was sentenced to seven years in prison.

In April, he was apprehended in western Uganda by a joint operation of the police, army, and Uganda Wildlife Authority.

Conservationists applauded the man's arrest and swift prosecution as sending a message that wildlife trafficking will be taken seriously by authorities.

Conservationists, on the other hand, warn that gaps in legislation in Uganda and the neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo continue to facilitate the illegal wildlife trade.

Bob Mbaya Kabongo was sentenced to seven years in prison on May 12 by a judge in Uganda's specialized court for wildlife crimes for smuggling 122 African grey parrots into the country from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Conservation organizations, as well as the Uganda Wildlife Authority, have applauded his arrest and prompt prosecution and sentencing.

Mbaya was apprehended with the African greys (Psittacus erithacus) on April 14 in Kisoro District, western Uganda. The Congolese national was apprehended as part of a joint operation by the Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA), the army, and the police.

Mbaya pleaded guilty in court to illegally importing wildlife into Uganda and unlawful possession of protected species in violation of Uganda's wildlife act.

Chief Magistrate Gladys Kamasanyu read out his sentence, saying that "a custodial sentence will send a message to other foreigners that Uganda is not a hub of abusing Wildlife creatures."

"I think what is important is that the law has taken its course, and we have seen justice being dispensed by the judicial officers," said Bashir Hangi, UWA's communications manager. Of course, we hope for harsher penalties in the future, but for now, we thank and applaud them."

Some of the African grey parrots seized in Kisoro District, Uganda. Image courtesy UWEC.

Conservation organizations from outside Uganda applauded Mbaya's successful prosecution.

"It is a stern warning to any would-be trafficker that if you think you're going to set fire to your house because you're going to run to a neighbor's house, the same thing awaits you," said Adams Cassinga, founder and CEO of ConservCongo, an NGO that works to protect biodiversity in the DRC, who claims that up to 90% of wildlife products illegally traded in Uganda originated across the border. Mbaya's arrest and conviction, he said, sent a strong message to wildlife traffickers.

"There is nowhere for them to hide any longer." We'll look for them, and if they jump [out of] one trap, they'll fall into the next, until wildlife trafficking becomes a thing of the past."

Rowan Martin, the World Parrot Trust's Africa Conservation Programme director based in London, agreed. "A sentence of this length establishes a significant precedent and should serve as a strong deterrent."

He stated that several steps must be taken to better protect threatened species from illegal trafficking, beginning with strengthening legislation in several countries where wild African grey parrots can still be legally trapped. This is the case in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, though exporting parrots is prohibited.

"Second," Martin added, "enforcement agencies and judiciaries must focus on dismantling trade networks, with efforts directed at the exporters and importers who make the lion's share of the trade profits."

According to Edith Kabesiime, campaign manager for the NGO World Animal Protection, the intercepted birds could still end up in people's homes because Ugandan regulations still allow people to keep African grey parrots and other species as pets.

"While we applaud this court decision, we must recognize that it only addresses the symptoms." We must address the demand side of the parrot trade by making owning wild animals as pets illegal and socially unacceptable."

Read More

Due to a lack of funds, Indonesia has canceled fisheries infrastructure projects in the Maluku region.

 A minister announced last month that Indonesia does not have the funds to build the National Fish Bank or a new Ambon port, two infrastructure projects promised by the national government in the Maluku province.

Sakti Wahyu Trenggono, Indonesia's fisheries minister, announced in April that the National Fish Bank in Maluku province, as well as a new port in Ambon, the provincial capital, would not be funded in the 2022 national budget. When President Joko Widodo announced the two national infrastructure projects during a visit to the eastern Indonesian province in March 2021, they created quite a stir.

The National Fish Bank would have been an integrated fisheries center or port with international and domestic container terminals, a liquefied natural gas terminal, a power plant with a kilometer-long pier, as well as fish auction and processing buildings.

The central government has promised and then abandoned the National Fish Bank project for the second time in ten years. The project was first proposed during the administration of Widodo's predecessor, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. The outcry from the province two time zones away from the nation's capital was shrill this time.

"It is unfair to say there is no money," Saadiah Uluputty, a Maluku member of parliament, said in a video sent to Mongabay. "There can't be an explanation. This [project] is connected to the president's promises made during his visit to Maluku. Declaring suddenly that there is no money is a public lie."

Abdullah Tuasikal, another Maluku MP, expressed dissatisfaction with Jakarta's announcement that the National Fish Bank would be replaced by a quota and size-based catch fishery policy in Maluku's waters.

"How can a quota be purchased by a small-scale fisherman with no capital?" Ruslan Tawari, a professor of fisheries at Pattimura University in Ambon, agreed.

Indonesia's 11 fisheries management areas would be subdivided into four areas with set quotas or total tonnage of fish that could be caught by small-scale fishers, commercial fishers, and hobby fishers under the quota-based program launched in February. The fisheries ministry's fish resources assessment commission, known as Komnas Kajiskan, determines quotas every two years. According to Ruslan of Pattimura University, "the quota system, unlike the National Fish Bank project, will not develop Maluku as a fisheries hub."

Ruslan also stated that politicians chose between the two programs. "The National Fish Bank debate should not be limited to politicians alone, but should include civilians as well." "All humans can think, but we are bad at working together," he said.

Amrullah Usemahu, general secretary of the Society of Indonesian Fishers (MPN), a non-governmental organization, and regional head of the Indonesian Fisheries Students Association (HIMAPIKANI), also spoke out on the matter.

"The project's progress has been up and down under the leadership of four fishery ministers," Amrullah said, referring to the National Fish Bank being proposed as a national strategic program for the first time in 2010. He went on to say that the project would have benefited eastern Indonesia by "reviving existing fishing ports throughout the Maluku region, [improving] logistics, routes, and the development of fishery supply chains exported directly from Maluku."

The central government originally intended Ambon as a location for port and general fishing industry infrastructure development. The projects were canceled in mid-March after an initial site feasibility study revealed that the chosen site in Waai still had abandoned mines from World War II in its waters, according to the coordinating minister for maritime affairs and investment. An active underwater volcano was also discovered during the feasibility study.

According to Amrullah, there is no reason why the National Fish Bank and promised updated port cannot take the form of a port expansion. "In fact, the central government could develop [the existing] Ambon or Tual ports or upgrade Dobo port," he said. He added that the eastern Indonesian regions of Maluku, Papua, and East Nusa Tenggara lacked type A ports, which house fleets that fish right up to the edge of Indonesia's exclusive economic zone. According to other news reports, the existing urban development around these older ports would limit the size of any potential expansion.

According to Amrullah, the national infrastructure project stalled when the port expansion was linked to the National Fish Bank fishery development area. "The infrastructure initiative should prioritize fishery development," he said. "We can't talk about fishery exports [and thus ports] if there aren't any fish."

Read More